Category Archives: Canada/US tax issues

LLC “CHECKING THE BOX” MAY HAVE PITFALL FOR CANADIANS!

An answer to Question 16 of the “CRA Roundtable”, that was part of the 20th Annual STEP Canada Conference held earlier this year, may lead taxpayers and their advisor to make dangerously uninformed decisions.

The question and answer are reproduced below:

 

“Given recent changes to the tax system in the US, Canadian resident persons who carried on business in the US through US LLCs may now prefer to alter this choice of entity for US tax purposes. An election is permitted in this case, the check-the-box election, whereby the US LLC may be designated to be a corporation for US tax purposes. In such a circumstance, where a check-the-box election is made, does CRA agree, generally speaking, that the making of the check-the-box election has no implications for Canadian tax purposes? It is noted that the Canadian tax treatment of the US LLC would be that it is a foreign corporation, and the check-the-box election would not alter this treatment for Canadian tax purposes.

CRA Response: Our understanding is that checking the box doesn’t change US law with respect to the classification of the entity and that it remains the same legal entity after checking the box as it was before. Therefore checking the box would not result in a disposition of either the LLC’s units or its assets for Canadian purposes. Checking the box could have an impact on Canadian residents though. There are previous written Roundtable answers where we talk about the impact on Canadians and now that the tax shifts to the LLC that could change those answers.”

Although, on the face of it, this seems correct and reasonable, it fails to fully consider a potentially important fact.

That is, I submit that, in most cases where Canadian residents control a US LLC, the LLC is actually a corporation that is resident in Canada. This is based on the fact that its “mind and management” or “central management and control” is in Canada. The shareholders (or “members”) normally act as managers and are the equivalent of Directors in a normal corporation. Given that, it would be hard to argue that it is not resident in Canada based on common law rules, regardless of the fact that it is formed in a US state.

The LLC, assuming it is treated as a partnership or disregarded entity for US tax purposes, is not a resident of the US for the purposes of the Canada-US Tax Convention (“the Treaty”). That is because it is not “liable for tax therein” as required by Article IV(1). Therefore, it cannot claim the benefit of the “tie breaker” rule in Article IV(3) of the treaty to avoid Canadian residency.

However, the greatest results can be viagra shops had by getting these tablets on a regular basis. So what are the causes of impotence in men? The three major causes of Erectile Dysfunction in a lesser time. cialis generic pharmacy 100mg has turned out to be the most amazing drug which has saved a lot of people. You can cheap cialis soft maintain harder erection for the complete love act and offer her intense sexual pleasure. Medications are available that control the levels of androgen and reduces the level of it to convert into DHT, but not stop it. viagra online mastercard http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/boy-and-his-dog-praying/ Hence, contrary to what is suggested in the question, in the typical situation, it is not actually a “foreign corporation” for Canadian tax purposes, but a Canadian resident corporation.

Often, out of ignorance on the part of the LLCs shareholders or advisors, they do not own-up to this fact in their Canadian tax planning and filings, but that is the reality.

Now, what happens if and when the “check the box” election is made? The LLC then becomes a US taxpayer and, by virtue of Article IV(3), it becomes a US resident for the purposes of the Treaty. Under subsection 250(5) of the ITA, it would then be deemed to be a non-resident of Canada. In effect, checking the box means that it emigrates from Canada.

Because of that, it will be subject to the application of the “departure tax” regime under subsection 128.1(4) of the ITA. This would entail, amongst other things, a deemed disposition of assets at fair market value.

In addition, a secondary level tax under section 219.1 will also apply. This tax would generally be equal to 5% of the fair market value of assets, minus liabilities and paid-up capital of shares at the date of emigration.

Accordingly, Canadians should not use the US “check the box” regime in connection with a US LLC without carefully considering the implications of a deemed emigration.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE 

Michael I. Atlas, CPA,CA,CPA(ILL),TEP

Michael Atlas is one of the most prominent international tax experts in Canada. He advises accounting and law firms all across Canada, as well as select private clients (corporate and personal) worldwide. He can be reached by phone (416.860.9175) or email (matlas@TaxCA.com). 

LITTLE-KNOWN PROVISION IN TREATY CAN ENSURE THAT AMERICANS GET FOREIGN TAX CREDIT FOR CANADIAN TAXES

The ability to claim credits for foreign taxes (“foreign tax credits”) (“FTC”) is the most fundamental and common way of avoiding double tax in connection with cross-border transactions. Both Canada and the U.S. have well-developed, and often complex, provisions within their tax laws to provide such credits where appropriate. Contrary to what many people think,… Continue Reading

CANADIANS SHOULD THINK TWICE BEFORE USING U.S. 1031 EXCHANGES

Just about everyone who deals with U.S. real estate investments hears about “1031 exchanges” at one time or another. For the few who have not, it is, essentially, a mechanism whereby a gain on the sale of real estate may be deferred for tax purposes by acquiring a new property. Canadians investing in U.S. real… Continue Reading

INTERNATIONAL TAX ASPECTS OF CANADIAN TAX PROPOSALS RE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS

On July 18, 2017, Canada’s Finance Minister Bill Morneau released a document entitled Next Steps in Improving Fairness in the Tax System by Closing Loopholes and Addressing Tax Planning Strategies. This was no surprise-the Minister had hinted at this some months ago at a tax conference. In a nutshell, the Minister, and his many left-leaning… Continue Reading

CANADIANS MOVING TO U.S. WITH CANCOS SHOULD CONSIDER “S CORP. BAILOUT”

Many Canadians who move to the U.S. are the sole shareholders of a Canadian corporation (“Canco”) that is either used for investment purposes, or which has substantial retained earnings generated from an active business. In such cases, they will generally face a Canadian tax hit when they leave (“departure tax”) in the form of a… Continue Reading

TRUMP CORPORATE TAX CUTS COULD TRIGGER CANADIAN TAX ON DIVIDENDS FROM U.S. SUBS

Shhhh! There is a dirty little secret that not many people know or talk about. A large percentage of U.S. subsidiaries (“Usco”) of Canadian companies (“Canco”) are actually resident in Canada based on traditional rules for determination corporate residency that are mainly derived from UK tax cases. This is because their “central management and control”… Continue Reading

TRUMP’S CORPORATE TAX PROPOSAL MAY HAVE FAPI CONSEQUENCES FOR CANADIANS

Donald Trump’s proposal to lower U.S. federal corporate tax rates to 15% will be welcome news for Canadians who are shareholders of a profitable U.S. corporation (“Usco”). However, in certain cases, the Canada Revenue Agency will have its hands outstretched for a piece of the tax savings. In cases where Usco is a “controlled foreign… Continue Reading

CANADIAN CORPORATIONS DOING BUSINESS IN U.S. VIA LLCs FACE BIG TAX PENALTY!

A Canadian corporation (“Canco”) which earns profits from carrying on business in the U.S. through a “permanent establishment” (“PE”) there will generally be subject to US federal taxes on its income derived from that PE. In addition to the normal federal income taxes on that income, as well as possibly state taxes, there is the… Continue Reading

CANADIANS CAN DEDUCT US TAX PAID RE LLCs EVEN IF NO INCOME REPORTED

As a general rule, a Canadian resident can claim of credit against his/her/its Canadian income tax liability for foreign income taxes paid (“foreign tax credit”-“FTC”). The rules relating to claiming FTCs are generally found in section 126 of the Income Tax Act (“the Act”). Unless the foreign tax is related to a business carried on… Continue Reading

CANADIANS WITH FOREIGN REAL ESTATE CORPORATIONS CAN FACE SURPRISING FAPI ISSUES

A Canadian resident who is a shareholder of a “controlled foreign affiliate” (“CFA”) will have special Canadian tax issues if that CFA earns “foreign accrual property income” (“FAPI”). Any corporation that is not resident in Canada (“Forco”) will be a CFA of a particular Canadian resident if it is controlled by that Canadian resident.  However,… Continue Reading